3
perhaps be held to justify the present proposal
with
regard
to the
fee payable to the b. J. Hong Kong - personally, however, I should have thought that souse regard should be paid
figure to the
or applicable in the case of dil fees above a
figme
to the annual amount of any fees donors that any reduction shed, be an a sliding scale fas in the ease of salaries. Moreover it is just possible that pars. Is is actually intended to refer massade to persons who are more or less regularly employed but whose remuneration is fixed in fees indead
of
in ammual emoluments.
On the whole I
nichined to
Outr
mggest that the 70. shild. be invited to get
exemption in this case,
peas. sanction for
especially if, as I presume is
the
case,
the work
is purely volunting, and the b.J. Caes to find his own travelling voulsistence expenses out of the fee?
They would looks rattens foolice if
the 6. J. declined to destabs the work at the reduced figure, out is tobe noted from the end. to one 72901/ 30 that the 7o. themselves describe the arrays as boots estrofactory reconomical?
malteenbill.
20/11/32.
つん
cut has
been appled
h
Diplomahn
Comentan sevices.
9
t
e.s.
Entertaiment
allus paid to Comial al Tonga,
oite Bit. Resident New Hebr.
HK
Sien
no
To except
this payment to the Chef Justice at
in respect of the Shanghai