stage of this scheme should eijut Lakhs.
overr
yield
? Telegraph authorsing OAG to proceed with the first stage of the
Scheme
Huguerz
9.5.52
in the first
If there is to be a modification
8
stage of the scheme, the obvious one is to omit the rebuilding of Gort. House. That
clearly open to intiim at the
is
present time, while the other items in
the first stage
are not. We might
discuss with his W. Peel,
J. Fr. Calder
On the other hand it seems
clear that the expenditure
on
mainitenance of Good. House in its
present condition is
I doubt whelties we are
uneconomic
justified in
-
cutting out one item particularly
The existing House
The sale
q
grounds is expected fully to cover the
cost of
a
convencent building.
JMRI aweld
Please arrange for désaumon with
Sir W. Peel
his arrival
VS. 12/5/32 at me
We do not know the exact date of Sir W. Peel's arrival as keis coming home rea Canada. He intends to call here in the middle
of June. ? be June 10t
Furquezon Stalder 12/5
12.5·32
2tva
Page
Page
9
Recicutated.
22/6132 Ser 9 Stücklagt
I discussed this with Sir .eel, and I understood that he
would also discuss it with you.
e informed me that he had put before the Executive Council
the possibility that objection might be taken on priciple to
starting on a new overument House at the present time, but
sejat
*
that the "ouncil ware unanimous that this formed a necessary
part of the scheme, and would moreover prove an actual economy
in view of the heavy liability for repairs involved in retaining
the existing ouse, which is, itself far from adequate for
its purpose. e is satisfied that there is very lit le risk
of the scheme not proving a financial succes.
# Plowell
20·6-32
Discured with Sir W. Peel who
Saterfied
me of
the wisdom
аз
un
mojiet.
? tetepoft authorising 0.1.9. to
proceed with the first stage o
scheme.
in
US
22/6/32
ESTRUTE DE STAL
1. H. 6
To Gov. tel 78
ator
24.6.32
ce
Sand 28.6-32
age 9
age 9
Pa
Pa
10
10
7-7-32.
7.0.A.G. Conf.
Refers to Grace 22. states that, in crics. indiculed it was unnecessary to region's
the position of the City Han cited
Sulger to any legal obsons
? Put by
8 Gov Conf
For
no dam except there
ہے
CA
17.9
925-83/21/
1/9
132
Submit's partier of a proposal to prende
the Governor with
And requesti
sum
a
Comulicy residence, to insert
apmoval
♪ $100,000 Moorsionally
be
draft posteater as the bungalow
at
the cost of Fawking.
ive
we have been led to suppose that the
a
the
selection of the site for the new Government House on
the Peak might result in the relinquishment of
Lountain Louge as a summer residence for the
Governor (see paragraph 6 of the Governor's
confidential espatch of the 17th December, 1951, (1),
an ú
10Page 11