G536
8.12.2
Yo
Ordmase
In the table of correspondence under
Section 6 I do not understand the words "last
three lines of s.s.(3) omitted".
There is no
such Section (3) Section 6 in either the old such Section (3)
or the new Ordinance.
Otherwise, I have no obsons. The
changes made in the law seem all to be in the
right direction.
? Sanction Ordinance on lines of G.3
mentioning the point in the first paragraph of
this minute, and saying it is probably a misprint.
No legal
oburrat i'm
the law
described
I have
名
How Jameso
6.2.33
Copsegin
7/2/33
the slight relapati in of
in suction 7(4) can hardly
the
no
double
"right
that
вы
#
direction but
it exporsoes moth
what is practically
practically possible I do not my gust
correctly in Hong King
neumay
تلن
ic.
that
to comment on
the Comparatin
Per mis pöial in
Table
necd
I think,
loe menti ined
dectin 5
_ it has "slipped" form the remarke on
Lignify
non-disallowane LF 4. Custom
&tlalder
20.2.331572
다