7
ill
to inform wall
leffects outside the Colony a wolf
Lobe glad
See (2) on 13717/1/33 & my minute of 21.1.33 thencon
which explains a misunderstanding. The objections of the HK, Chamber Commerce are against the Foreshore Sea Bed Works Bill
not against the foreshores & Sea Bedrmendment Brace.
Fuqameron
24.2·33
the FO
to consult the F.O.
may by consulted
sexy
regarding any particular Ordee which appears to have such under bearing. (on the present case the possible repercussions in Cuina were not realised at the time we
were considering the Proce. Enclove a copy of the desp suggested bellows saying it was assumed that
arquing that h. Order yould have no obyletion pa copy offer letter
Send
it was
copey
with
coper
|(9)
or enclos to Hongkong by short desp ref(8) asking that in any case where in the Loo's opinion a Hong Kong Drace may post have ill affects outside
far the Colony a particularly in linna
attention
may
be drawn to the
•binge
gcommunicat confidentially to the Goo of Hhlong
possibility when the Prace is forwarded for the signification of H. M's pleasure]
√31-12-32
(4) has crossed (7). I should puit [] until we get a refly from F.O. The desirable thing is that the it.K. Gurt. should bear in mind possible referenssions in China, and consult the 5.ofs., before they
introduce
hills into their Legislative Concil. J. A. Calder
3.1.33
Iff conson. Sie Ihmuckburgh should al aft
10
To Oade.
9.ANSWD