·
I agree we need not comment,
He
only
3(2) The present rule is that bemor officers
6
get 18t. Class passages & the decision whether an
'senior or not rests with is to be regarded as
offens
the tow. The new rule provides that officers whose
£800 shall receive 1st class
max. salary is over passages, tothers 2nd class only.
This will exclude quite a number of faarly
responsible officers (e.g. classes I - III of the bemor blerical Accounting Staff, the Bad. Asst. Audita, the Dep. slipping houster, mercantile mecrime office; the chief Preventive offices +tte Sen. Revenue fpeer, Import sports dept; the Asst. Analysts, med. Dept, the blich Ausp., Suiting Dept. 72. +c.), but I
auppose we can assume that than's
has been done deliberality.
I am not quite clear, Iwwever,
whether to new rule will be taken to exclude
badet's (umpassed), and Police Probationers - presumably not miss that used tunela
not comment ?
(૧)
need
3(9) We do not recoguire france's passages",
elsewhere, and on
the whole I thich we should
suggest that the tume has not yet arrived
for the grant of this privilege?
3/10). I delete as afe of his service in H.
Kong'
proposed in paraty of 3.
mals wenbull,
411/32.
T.O.