3
in a Balance Snes filled in June 1928, contrary to Sect. 7 of the Perjury Orth, and (c) having with intent to deceive publisher a frandulens statement Live. In chan Aalua Shers), contrary to Sect. 41 of the Larceny
Orth. He was committed for trial
all three charges.
I do not
propose
ro
9%
into the
bewildering financial transactions of the
as discred in the
Coy
in the procating, and it will be sufficiens to say how, in regard to the first change, - which as with sun was the only
subsequently dealt with, - thas the alleged false statement was that the Cozy
which was
had naived in moped of it's shares for cash the sum of $876750, whereas the ccfuck
cast maine
A
fractional part o
amount. What was described as
mat
cash was
alleged by the prosecubine to be promissory notes, the Company apparently having allotted fully paid-up Shares to shareholders, and having naind in
Exchanp
only about 5 to 10% of the face value in
Linory to be taking from
cask, and having accepted an
I shanhilduro
Yo
pay
m
demand.
jury in me
At the trial before the Acting Chicf Justice (MS. J.M. Wood) and a jury Supreme Cours in Jan", 1930, Bruses ugunster that the three charges might to taken together as he cresident he might to prejudiced if my
taken separately,
but the
a/Chief Justice
bin