Ai dhe "Hong Kong Daily Pruss

"

of Mark 25,1931. ThAD

415

Sir John Simons' speech was very special

pleading.

He first attacked Lord Passfield

for having described the Mui-tsai custom as

the adoption of young girls. He then quoted

from Hong Kong newspaper, but it ought to be

obvious to anyone by this time, that what a

newspaper says when attacking a Government, is not evidence.

Next, he produced a deed of

sale and played on the sentimental side of the

House. From his quotations it is clear that

the bill of sale is the first one referred to

in the Hazlewoods Pamphlet (31 of 82759). Both

Sir John Simon and the Hazlewoods imply that

the sale actually took place in Hong Kong, but

are

they are both careful not to say so definitely.

It seems probable that, as in the other case

quoted by the Hazlewoous, the sale took place

in China.

As regards the numbers of Mui-tsai,

Sir John Simon repeated the usual unconvincing

arguments and was fully answered by Dr.Shiels.

Simon

Finally, Sir John Shiels quoted the first

sentence of a Colonial Office letter (No.42 on

82759). It is obvious that the omission to

include in his quotation the two succeeding

sentences of that letter, was deliberately done

in order to convey an entirely false impression.

It seems unnecessary to send a long

despatch to the Governor until we receive his

despatch of 28th April, but in sending out a

copy

G

Share This Page