3.
Sir M Ladle
felter from Sin 17.4.5 dcbest 21-2-31
The first para. requires
21/2/.
4
ma. Then had to samme
effect and placed a copy with the appropricht file.
Second pare. further
be awaited.
Third. Subject to correction by the for host Defet. I
Suggest that it would be safer for Sin 17.9 to get into
C-
brūch wilt qui willian Homall- the Vos first. He knows him wall - cach could contifully offer his services if
appeal to sie Rebeck Hoturg is throught desirable and
M
requis support them sin w. Hornell can obtain. The letter on it stands at present.
weekly
what is not the case that there is at present parvising pr. Chinese studies in 19.4 university- and intain might be reach as suggesting that we appel has yet been made to local magnates on behalf
of
the University for improving this parisien. This in very for from waing times.
Mr. Ellis.
Arthe Mugh
23-2
I think it best to send this along to you
for disposal, as I only came into the matter by the
accident of the absence of Dr. Shiels and Sir John
Shuckburgh.
inserted
I attach a copy of my reply to Sir Michael
Sadler, and you will see that I have adopted Mr.
Mayhew's suggestion that it may be well to feel our
way before an appeal is made to Sir Robert Ho Tung.
I have not examined the letter to Sir R.
Ho Tung, but the drafting of the first paragraph
seems to be open to amendment.
کی ہے۔ کیا
6.4.8.246.2.31