206 7.0
7.0 (F4046/29/10)
வெ
2A in dift u
aff
www.
See.
27. I for Wul. Nr. 95 Sae
28 Y. 70.
1
Walder
B/T ju/e 27 8/26.
29
30
7.0 (F589/2/10)
10.
૪
10 ang
11. 8.31
داحمد
23.
10. 31
Copy deep por bir tu hampson No-1209 of 18-8-31
f
I entirely agree with Sir Miles Lampson's
views. It would be in the long run disastrous to
suggest that the Chinese in Hong Kong are entitled
to the special consideration of the Government
of China.
Such a claim would inevitably lead
them to put forward a claim to the right of
protecting Hong Kong Chinese in other ways. The
desired privilege could, therefore only be obtained
as a quid pro quo for something else which Hong
Kong could offer the Chinese Government.
Unfortunate -
ly, almost anything Hong Kong could offer, e.g.,
special facilities for the working in the Colony
of the Chinese Customs or Salt administrations would
be of such a nature as to bring Hong Kong mo re
into line with the Treaty ports and the effect of
any