2.

certainly did not wish to have to do so. I handed

him a copy of your memorandum of April 2nd to Chinese

Minister in London to make attitude of His Majesty's

Government clear.

There must be some give and take and so far it

was we who were doing major part of the giving. No

other Power was going as far as we and May 5th was a

matter of Chinese domestic politics not of ours.

4. As we were making no headway I asked him if

there was anything we could do to ease his government's

position vis-à-vis public opinion if they met us?

But he professed to have no ideas.

5. Reverting to period of 10 years I admitted

the possibility that as regards legal safeguards e.g.

counsellors, etc., some shorter period might be

possible. But that was a matter for discussion once

principle of reserved areas was agreed.

6. I shall now let time work and see whether

Chinese make any practical counter suggestions.

Imminence of May 5th should be an incentive.

Addressed to Foreign Office No. 112 of April 20th,

repeated to Peking.

50

Page 50Page 51

Share This Page