23 CA

4.8

8

Have released £₤165-000 47% Funding

Loan Bonds 1960.90

and £130.

000

5% Conversion Loan Bonde 1944-64 to the Bank

£300

من میشه

ми

et change for

ove 47% Funding Loan Bonds

1960-90

(The exchange in 23 is curious)

?

Wok Putty 22

Duft 23 to Treas? LFM/18

17 Martin 6.8.31

1.07

74 To Juas. (Me 23) - Bish —

J.A. Calder

6.8.31

Four

Page

Page

Thissh?

· so on

82703/X.K.

25. Treasury (0/0)

when available.

Sir Campbell.

Hong Kong Currency.

age 9

x 9

15 July 31

The Chartered Bank of China, India and

Australia wrote to the Treasury propo sing an

increase in the amount of their note currency

which is at present limited to $30,000,000.

Mr. Waley arranged for a conference with the

Chairman of the Bank, Mr. Bruce, and askedme to

be present. Mr. Clauson and I went to the

Treasury accordingly but, unfortunately, Mr. Waley

had been called away and therefore I had to take

charge of the discussion.

The Chartered Bank have put in a draft

of a revised Charter which has been under

We

consideration by the Treasury and ourselves for

a long time. We have gone on the principle that

it is to be regarded as a consolidating Charter

(their present Charter and supplemental Charters

constitute an almost inextricable muddle).

have agreed to alterations which merely represent

eliminating provisions which have actually become

obsolete, but we have told the Bank that we think

it better not to introduce any amendments which

would constitute a change of practice. I therefore

told Mr. Bruce that we were disposed to keep to

this point of view and that we should not like to

introduce into the new consolidating Charter an

alteration in the limiting figure of the Bank's

note issue. The Bank quite appreciate this and

accordingly suggest that there should be a short

supplemental Charter altering the figure for the

note issue, and that the consolidating Charter

should be proceeded with later on.

A

age 9

Page

Page

10

A new Charter or a supplemental,

Charter has to go before the Privy Council. I cannot remember exactly what the procedure

is, but there is undoubtedly a document which

must pass the Great Seal, and this cannot be

done without a Council Meeting. There will be

a Council Meeting on July 28th, and the date of

the next one is quite uncertain. I think,

therefore, and I told Mr. Bruce, that it is

absolutely impossible to get through a

supplemental Charter, should we decide in favour

of one,in time. Mr. Bruce suggested that the

Bank might be authorised to exceed their issue

limit and that the matter might be put right

later on by a supplemental Charter. So far as

I can make out, if we let them exceed their

limit, they would merely be transgressing the

terms of their Charter and rendering themselves

liable to its forfeiture. Of course if they

did it with the concurrence of the Treasury and

ourselves, there would be no question of

forfeiture, and I do not think that they would be

committing any breach of the law of Hong Kong

or would be liable to any penalty in that

Colony. Therefore I think that in the last

resort we could, if the Treasury agreed, tell

the Bank that they might exceed their Charter

limit and that no ill results should follow.

But I do not like playing tricks with such

things as Royal Charters, and would certainly

not advise such action except in a grave

emergency.

I therefore pressed Mr. Bruce to

say

ge 10

ge 10Page 11

Share This Page