3
Y
except the
Suppection in para 4
Doups h/w for cousin. as
directed.
This differs from the Kenya case dealt with in 15733 in that in
29 Hing King it has apparently but been the practice to issue c'foil receipts for Court ficces while in Kenya it was sought to dispense with a system already in use which was said to be inemoaniqui in working on
the numerous
acconut
receipsis which had to be written for hrivial amounts.
to There is no necessity t reproduce §§ 4,√ √ 6
y the chirpaten to Kenya (@) in 15733) in the clespatel to sting King as the VAG says nothing About the difficulty of mumerous small fives in that colony. Johan
Sariaw
19.3.30
29
2. Z. O.A. G. 82. (1 aned) bons. 25.3.30
Leu
し
31.3-30
3. Pov: 372
16.7.30.
System of issuing numbered counterfoil receipto for fine's pard, has been introduced