3
new Chinese Nationality law.
that is so (though ru. Mors seems to
share some
If
of 120 Goodman's doubts about it), there will be no
need for any arbitrary arrangement
such as proposed by Si C. Clementi M in faras se 6 of (4).
I do not thomok we can
suffert his suggestion (infare 8) that us furtured denationalijation
should be required in the case
Chemise all nationals
who
co through the process of
Britists naturalization.
? Dufl. (4) to FO. for any boons,
ray that Sof$ consider it
Sous
infort aut that in any newstration
on this subject the exact
position of
descendants of denationcelig ef
Chinese should be made clear. He
of