Note No.2.

NULLA H.

37

1.

A subsidiary point of Mr. Davidson's is that the

Government made it one of the terms of the sale of areas "A" and

"B" that Mr. Kwik should construct the invert, and two feet in

height of the eastern wall, of the nullah to the eastward of M.L.

431, and not only his own western wall, and should this "add to his

obligations". This, though true, is misleading as thus stated

because the proposal was that the Government should pay him the

estimated cost of this additional work, i.e., $24,000. It is

conceivable that that estimate was too low, though I have no reason

for thinking so, but if it was Mr. Kwik should have taken that up as

a special point at the time. He definitely accepted this term

without question in his letter of 5.1.23, which was a general

acceptance of the terms of the Director of Public Works' letter of

2.1.23.

2.

It may be explained that the above proposal was made

because it was considered that it was a better arrangement for the

construction of the nullah and that greater protection would thus be

afforded to the east wall of M.L.431.

3.

As Mr. Jackman says in his minute of 15.11.27, "It is made

to appear that certain terms had been forced on Mr. Kwik for

acceptance, but he was quite free (either to refuse or to accept)

the terms offered by the Government for an extension".

have stood on his original contract if he had so chosen.

4.

He could

As a matter of fact, the Government eventually agreed

to contribute $31,837.80 towards the cost of the nullah, and this

figure was agreed to by Mr. Kwik. It should be explained however,

that the Government agreed to pay the extra $7,000 odd because the

nullah wall had to be increased in thickness when it became obvious

that the reclamation eastward was not likely to be undertaken for some

time.

Share This Page