5
+
M
in writing
at the Butte Juston's
ив
4.O.
Nutter H. Elbis
14/1
t
I agree that (his would be a desirable
Extension
the low
f
if
we had only
Strugkong
and
Canton to take into account,
The
question is whether the precedent
would embarrass
.M. G. in de
G. in dealing
with other foreign powels.
I would consult the F.O.
He H.O., giving
On this point
as well cant
item a lead in favour
of the bill, subject to there possible
offjections.
And the Dimensions Office may like
to consider whether it could have
any possible bearing
on the American-
- Canadian negotiations about liquor
vayy
not
smuggling. I should liquor question is vir gencris
in
any
like
a
-
-
the
ands
there is something dangerously
precedent in our dangerous ducgs legislation, which could be more careful to the
Americans.
GG. 16.1.29.
As proposed.
27.1.28.
atonce