the soft's celler of 26 nor
m
52056
12
Gives
Quan
intimation
that
bash for thes
10 To 1.0. (ufanja. 12)
4
со сторо
aft submited
Aberken 4/1/25
Mrs
Enquiries as to painto
14 UEC
27.11.28
to points that have arisen in considn. of proposed change
17. horland
so for
in method of
assessment.
18. 0.4.3. bouf (2)
Confuns ho. 144 finds. details
of estimate
1.11.28.
tome allowance has Wote wade
wade for
No.17.
Taking the points raised one by one.
(1) The figures quoted are roughly accurate.
According to the table in 14661/26 the total
contribution on the old system between 1901 and 1927
was approximately 59 million dollars: on the new
basis it would have been 49 million, showing a
Rent Restriction fees deficiency of 10 millions.
з
Th
(see last colum (ath) but it does
not kids. the Jah.
ABB.
The figures, excluding
the years from 1922 onwards, are 36 millions and
31 millions. This is certainly rather a difficult
point to get over and our answer must be that it is
contended that various deductions should have been
made from the contributions
made from the contributions on the old system, and
the 0.A.G's. estimates show that these would be
7show
amend ed