3
Roted in
Precedent Book (c)
2 To Sa. 116
specifically in their agreement. In this
case it is so stated specifically in the
agreement and the effect, therefore, I think,
is to make them entitled to the leave which,
under General Order 147, would only be granted
in exceptional circumstances in cases where the
right to it had not been specifically conferred
by the contract.
In short, I think that probably the
most reasonable construction you can put upon
these quite inconsistent documents is that,
with such a letter of appointment as is
mentioned, the officer has a right to the
vacation leave mentioned in Order 147.
21/3
I my
that in
the fum
tio
of words recommended an diff 117 fear with te multitabel for Mefan qurtles in this defen
1 0 APR 1928
Mus
H.G. 26.3.15
24.2.25
at de