- 3 -

27

6. Is it recognised that fran documentary evidence in the

Shroff's safe that the Shroff is apparently practising as a

Honey Lender and a Rent Collector.

7. Is it recognised that, in conjunction with the Head

Bailiff the Shroff coliccts debts on behalf of Creditors who

have not apparently taken proper action through the Court.

8. An explanation should be given as to why the Shroff has

in his custody, in various envelopes, money relating to

Court actions which has not been paid into the Treasury.

9. What explanation can be given as to the ownership of

two Gold Watches, Chain and Jade Pendant, one box containing

a quantity of Gold Bangles and other jewellery, and a small

box said to contain jewellery the key of which could not be

produced, and further the reason for the articles being kept

in the Government Safe.

10. What explanation can the Registrar give to the fact that

the Shroff has been allowed to pay Court money into his

personal banking account, ultimately reimbursing the

Government.

11. The Registrer might request the Shroff to remove his personal effects of an improper nature from the Government

Safe.

12. When was the Auctioneering and Erokering Co. Ltd. first employed by the Court.

13. Why were practically all sales given to this particular firm, in view of the fact that there are several other

recognised Auctioneers in the Colony.

14. Was the Registrar satisfied as to the financial

stability of the Auctioneering and brokering Co. Ltd. when

he appointed them Court Auctioneers.

15. Why has the Registrar allowed the nett proceeds of

sales

Share This Page