52. F.o.
F.O. were a
(Why Pahing Tel.1077 of 2.10)
little worried
because this refers to H.K. Pal.
&
30th whereas No. 45 is dated 29
4.10.28
14
Tel.
ret. of
16.
Tel. Sec" tell
me that it was actuall
actually
Sent
30th
(12.204.17.) 9
& arrived here
Σ
m29th.
q
It seems
clear only
له
Tel
is
involved
F.O. 4
aqill
Ther
do
seems working fras te
hendring further
(it is scarfrising they
53. Adhy
news
hut of proprals fr
healy
? Put
Rs.
four H.K.
have
خسگا برد
4.10.48
Pracy of 55. "Anking "
an
5.10.28
The wording of the telegram is not likely
to prepidice the t.0. in
favour of the proposal. ? but by
1