29 13 Wipeg
10
10
Le raxton,
с
14th February, 19xt.
7
17
In reply to the questions raised in ur letter or
the isth or J.nu ry, i write to :y that the kiner i practice
ceg ras extr dition from Hong kong is governed by the
Chiuose Fatradition Ordinace, which provides for formei
etraition proceedings na not be ely for the production of
warrant, ut under vreiii. e No.7 of loss extradition is
not permitted in the case of win 1 mey Le Alam (s "politic:1"
CILMCS.
From De interaction in our possession it coula
7
eppe r tn. & no Jorm..
1 deport tion or tatr ult.on either of
inalvial LE Or On . #holes lo se i: ODE 1 Comection with
The 100 persons L
LJ who. Pui-hemd is me in the telegraa
from neng some ɗ but the 17th De couper, reproduced in your
Letter, Lut to t a number of suspiciou. Un r cters proceeding
frow Canton with the intention of landing in Long Long were
refused scission es likely to we : anger to the pe ce end
good order of the Colony.
Lr
J. Maxton Esq., M.P.
Y urs sincerely,
& Gove