38
the aeroplanes siträdsertidárás
Ventanarcial are, in fact, used for
military purposes.
even
Moreover, it is
not get the case that all
military aeroplanes are excluded from
China under the China Arms Embargo
Agreement, since as a result of the
representations made by the French
Government in 1925, aeroplanes of French
origin, at been detained in transit
人
for China whether orinatreenexpanded
by certificaatas fit serviconmeveieu
In this connection, I am
to invite reference to Foreign Office
letter No.F2224/1/10 of the 19th June,1925,
and to the C.O. reply of the 29th. June 1925.
3.
It is further understood that
Whether commiscial or
in characts,
heilitary
have not since that date
Itk
27963/25 155
in response to Sir M. Lampson's representa-
tions, sanction was recently given for
a supply of Vickers aeroplanes for Chang
Tso-Lin. These aeroplanes appear to
have been described as 'commercial' in
order that there might be no conflict
with the terms of the China Arms Embargo
Agreement; but there seems to have been
no