24
Noted in Precedent Book.
There is no objection to
only appointing/single men,
but any promise by them to remain single or not to
marry (it does not matter which way you put it)
would be void. In the case of an ordinary employer
this would mean that, if an employee disregarded
the promise, he would not have committed a breach
In the case entitling his employer to dismiss him.
of the Crown, no reasons for dismissal are necessary
in law; and in equity it may be that such a course
would not be unreasonable where the officers had
accepted their appointments on a clear understanding
of the requirements in question.
25/0
Then let s
have
a
fresh
draft embodying the new
( do site des lety
para. ( do wit
old one)
The
a let it go through
d.
Mr. Treshe to die d. Wilson
100
1192
9 to So. bory (2)
Major Kurse
Capt Newboll
toser.
G.E
27.10.2
15 NOV 1927