7 Fo
Los
сору
memo
Indemnity Advisory bette.
28 Mar 1924
by Chaciman of China commenting
ow
Gov's deap.
The kines
J
this memo.,
in which thi
Ctu. endeavour
li bollü up their case,
Arc
and
even
Mensive
as
1 ниба
7
to controvanial
il
out
J
the question for
That Hi Fo should send
the
as
a
In
an
Pficial letter
letter replying
is nothing
Luove
Isend it to 14. Sov.
copy Whis
becaus
to personal lathes
1
Im
from the Sof 5 Limself
Ikan
a piece of gros discontiny.
I do not attempt
in detail I though
atainly fout up
li criticize
Hi meme
/
wih
a
conati- memo
if desired)
Comm
Kab
truck is of
Ctc. Lave no case.
because 11=
on Hi marità alone 12=
The position is
That itis
regard the handing back of the Indemnity
gglare of conciliation and good will.
15
give any part the money
a
and
KHong Kong
a
would conflict with the principh, to which Fo
Lave publicly
commitied Hms, that thi
allocation ofthi fund must be left Be Selimined
by the Board of Trustees in China when constitutid.
Even if this principle
to Hong Kong
gth: quture.
This policy
way
set aside any gift
would detract from the value
holds Hi field, Köugh the
present anavoty has caused a
anarchy
Bill.
postponement Whi
The Ctu. Lave Lowever shown tat