The
argument
cut at A is a good
good one.
But B
cut and hurt
is not an additional argument
C
be taken
a
part J
A.
I must
Jay
tab
On
457
further reflection it
seever to wee very surprising
Shaughan does not have pay
on the alla rech for Ith.
the Imperial Fort.
Rat R CT
income tax
He is a Savaut
and his salary
CJ is derived fr. Imp. funds and is
Subject to Imp. income.tax.
can understand that
Shanghai
income lax
Ź
tirli
by
Which one
This
uzidanan
Lo woned be exempt fr.
on his privati income
/ sht.
have Kought that the I.R. autorities would
Lave been only
lo
to claim that
only
eager
income derived by
any
virtue of his official position
wheller paid by the lap Each
Subject
to lip income tax.
appear In the cam
are correct
mr hf she h
This does not
and I wonder if the Fo
stating the position. M
Robinson, with whom I discussed the print.
Seemed
van Lazzo
I
I shr. be inclined as there is no hurry to get
Something
out J. I.R. So.
ww it not for the
fact that our intervention might lead there.
to claim herre
fr. Sir Skinna Turner than they
Lave hiltartó Kought of.
On the Werz