139
is is lawful fɛe ki, te hald, sneralno and mjoy 18y
JurLadies Lam in China in the same sad sa
as if X.M. had noquired the jurtadletion by
esse inn
or sonqueet of torrisory (Beckien 7),
that Power and under the Trenty the system of heitiah
deurta în china has been establ tahad.
The Privy Joana 11
expressly dostéed that a souviešion for murder in a sADO
tried by a jury of five persons saly (na provided in the
Japanese Order in Deuna11) was perfastly good and sansti-
tuklamal.
Something has been maid in the papers on this
metter about the domisils of British subjects in dhina.
dimes that
vas spitims the latter has been
authoritatively stated fa the House of Lorde in the esse
of Jaedagli
It was there held that a British
dandag11.
subjast san seguire a domislis in an Extraterritorial
aɔɔuntry Alio China;
in consequense of that dosision
1.B, H. iaprama Deurk has been given Juriocletion. In
divores. be have always ruongnised the existence of
keetch on äsuth African denisile; and nativos of fadia
som burdly be said to be domielled in the imited Kingdom.
There is
sukhority in law for saying that BritLab
subjects in the sivil employ of the Chinese Government are
demtailed in china, bet this has never been desided.
It is not always roumbered that a very large
of money la tabus in Jhina by British Jourts Iron
notates of deconaes british objecta. This is taken
guino et a Judialal fos, bas it is regarded by the
Inland Revenue authorities in ingland as being nstate
The rekes have resmbly boon stiffmod, and we DON
balo 10% of all estatos at £40,000 and upwards. LAPECKY thanks to this fee which, though threatased, has never
really be shalimgod, the haprome dourt and the consula
Services