I
חרו
omitting § I of the draft.
We could not consistently with the Washingtoh agreement recogniza tião de jare gout? in China, & it does not seem to be
one place to suggest it. The S.ff. did not propose to do so
at the Conference referred
may
There
be much to be said four this policy, but I fear
sabe
should
perhaps weaken our position.
Uci-a-vic's the 7.0. if
to adoscate it officially. Our
business in to press the clacines
is to press the clasins of
Hong Kong
& we should be going as
are tried
hillte beyond
our book if
to formulate a poling for som.G.
a
refords China jenerally.
14.12.26
Bee of State.
G.G
Jagree with his f. frendle
as repands the omission
""
of pane 3. I would go fuorter
and omit para z alos.
384
As I have said on the draft, I
twobetter Teach
am a little doubtful as it is our bevereas to try & The 3.0 their job! Presumably,
the 1.0 know as well as we
de that the situation
haschappe
since her Deichman wrote his
Memorandum in August bent.
Iworld merely acknowledge their letter (as in pare 1) and trasomit to be laid before this A Chamberlain (as in presen) his C. Clemente's despatch, adding that you hope the despatch may
receive careful consideration
ete.
6.1.6
14.12.76