1
which they are concerned without their coppuration.
MR. CHEN: Does that exhaust your points?
MR. KEMP : Yos.
If you add the objection to the delay in the settlement of the boycott as the proposal stands at present.
The Chinese dulcgation then left the room for a con- sultation, which lasted fifteen minutes. On their return
in.
MR. CHEN: We will deal first with the point concerning the French. We have no objection to the French being brought We consider the French question a suparate issue and would prefer that it would be decided suparately. If the British delegation insist on bringing them in we have no objection, but it would suit us better to dual suparately with the British and Chinese question and the French and Chinos question.
In the matter of the preliminary expenses of the
ommission we wish to state that we are prepared to follow
International practice and this also applies to the matter
of the deposit.
370
As concerns the question of the liability of witnesscs,
at this distance of time this criticism applics to allywitnesscG
equally. Cross-examination, addresses and summing-up will
savi
all that.
We wish to state that (f) in our Enquiry proposal staturunt
will exclude lotters to the papers, but will not exclude despatches
As to Mr. Kump's point as to the fitness of the Judgus to undertale
the double duty, I wish to emphasise our views on this point.
First, the Conference
rone has reached the point where the Chinese
dologation think that a third party must be entrusted with the