I
ל
5.
2661-
t
mikeytanari klút bas „nosmuki gatavi her! socked wit MO pchuu yaokaos virðhile add morî agents do no infgfont pomanik dr" bonejo, as exit notdeadenost ukfit to sewpo 6:"i
„abia suduž and not
7
+
omenirii ait to Jooentata sad ni živíð soljon al
adi zavo yĺtd 21 sang of 'mber 21 3podin de noktualel 21 Jaiteula terti sul not på Lidkanogan lo solteau,
"coadsoçmi yts broosa” to Infog a að 3! Jadi betsejuu hastant blai at saezdu hna "qrant latição a dos al" bas
al. Digong wit yd beruðst wilt sild to yðaraðal edd ne
arið drit zakłanoo en die Meloadła auð rey[samúð Arwo?
303Fy to sit ybæjard weld of auên ew, Jaz saor£ to moltzang
piso doci dalt Jalani Jan 9. Jużog alah no bun,soustroqui
cild deedte sezsentis docet. Las faidi! to sonellve and
Jud,obis azout.20, vilt no nasí zaktquis sið tædd Jacī
duinol unit yd sinu datu caddis, brossa no osia es ́engið
best, oʻiew ani,anuzitie montrer å hus „alommal deltae bac
ɔginians' two tżedt to yledi.Pob Fiúsar bar pa ið við 3
afocs a Looduk (ori berit snow adoda Janil ə A
doneri bru dafðinu add yo opuotot Maa al borından 19.
nd nonser Erd,evods. beclaiço as ofi.,mament 10 26010".
už bas,babreðul asv boslal oft no inatlı as Jadi arollad
- cel of Jezmdie son much noite slab sauntin
met Juni duocer lo adreido sios and sha med owed dalðir
stəmilərdi yine oilt Jo. stev gula solaw ri aðnsblond
.ofrisonce
nonim odł dɛgjueu. 1 uurò usiðimo lu
J...
grave responsibility for the sacrifice of those lives must
rest with those who wantonly began the attack, and with the
Chinese authorities, who, deregarding the fally and danger of their action, allowed inflamable material to be placed ready to the hands of egitators seeking for an opportunity
to cause a conflagration.
The Chinese delegation, in their definition of the
ensuing boycott of British trede, have implied that this
movement is a voluntary abstention from all comercial
reletions with the British, and they add that the boycott
has been sustained by the Chinese people for more than a
year. With great respect we say most emphatically that that
definition and that statement are entirely at variance with
the facts.
It is imposed
The abstention is not a voluntary one.
on an unwilling people by a small but powerful organisation of persons who maintain the boycott by force of arma and who do not hesitate to shoot down their own fellow country- men when the latter try to continue those normal relations which ought to exist between close and friendly neighbours, and which will certainly, sooner or later, burst through the artificial and economically unsound barriers which prevent their free action at prasant. It would be easy to test the correctness of this assertion, and we are quite
1 aure that if these barriers were removed the current of trade and friendly intercourse would flow freely again, bringing mutual benefit to Chinese and British alike.
Te need scarcely say that we do not ask that any voluntary abstention should be "suppressed by force". All that we ask is that an involuntary abstention should not
Te do be maintained by force or artificial means.
not wish to be misunderstood here. We fully realise that
a year ago many Chinese believed, erroneously as we