.antxe, Tejaimil .M.H os

[819090-9J3L8п00 .M.8.н·

IAHOMAHE

.asul,yzaural, Mitus

Isrgnerf, Lerened-Ivan。0 .M.li

YTC0

(JS\SSƏ) TI .ok

(a@iqos & #}

-outswith woy jaeupat of wvonod edð svul I

noljastelget Toi noitsofiqqa sa anibrBEST BNOIJ Brand to IDEIDO E và "50 dua doi TEA BR (A) anti-rah`nedo` benen gaar

end to 1taja wild na beyoïgra et neil

kind of nona al bue awal vibai. ANINO NJTOH

CœNG TO BEG we ou werfüla colecfaq MIFF, FI

In a frien Võ BY SAINT E BỊ Đ . “18qនq as drenuntoĝĝo in nevta med sad ; low-b7 ynex ‚b‚azistin qlétoï mul unenud end of zerivie

seentru a se beweeg eelwo♫N VE OỬ BYwle bed

.J59tdun“

- Bit of moldeotIcon aldeban ed garli

toletods saw an noidartaiger tot solito Jrog raduwi rei Kuanot antton and of bertslát

.vttupat

en vtilenoidea daĺčrta zo toong nh

, yonbyć je beurat ajapikiSTAO (iStid e besuborg Dilaci rṣtim to own end ni esia MJNOP WAL bus Tomobraz # lanov da man to Taon,gauo? eli foodmat ul irtod kod „anonu oon met da

ABW Anan LAGT n'eral aid Jörð bentaiçre BOJALO NTAJRền and où gatwo jud. „ansy meio

VICTOR

..O..O.,vesIneli bis „Tednikim a'gjeołam sık

of placing the surname last, he was alway# called Yang or Young, and had accordingly adopted the latter as his name in Australia. The photograph on the back of the certificate, moreover, is undoubtedly that of ur.Chen and would seem to be good evidence that Chen Han-ming and Walter Lenlie Young are

the same person.

Asked if he had ever registered before,

Bar, Chen at first stated that he had not done so and excused himself on the ground of ignorance of the regulations. Shortly afterwards, however, he informed Mr. Brenan that the above statment was untrue and that he had previously been registered in Shang- hai in 1915, but owing to his fear that -ritish subjects might be conscripted for the war, he had written to the Consulate renouncing his british nationality. He now wished to become british again because he lived in chapei (the Chinese suburb adjoining the hanghai settlement) and desired protec- tion from Chinese troops during the present

troubles.

A reference to the records showed that

a letter dated Hankow, July 4th 1917, was

in fact received from #. L. Young purporting

to renounce his British allegiance, but a reply had been sent care of His lajesty "s" Consul-General at Hankow informing hâm tḥatį

1 am such a statement was of no effect. unable to say whether this reply was, ever

received/

687

4

• ДИГНЕ Ч

Share This Page