T
•
262.
FOREIGN OFFICE, 8.0.1.
10 .
, mida le paróc sit of bationerand 20 tonnas
Inne grainyooq to Javoue niedrno s'to antTSİNƏT
„Viatich so. “Bíná vað vistur domuɔ bok daud 'e trzewod
...i itatennas Isudu: le volion add to mirmtra
tubemand yourdy and tedie deer noderebow I
J
sat pema sand (yali meiðina gas antyf) giuÁBBI C
19: 600 Zað driūns of sidh atë dhemeIDVED Synodyni
建
.W nguono niæs430 10 poolaikymo neliela - "IPITU
1
*S OF ICISTNA HIUSHTAR AN CUea di do sumažin
·
Jusibade Jeom. UŸ
JAZYTOP Pfumit
pozeimt eemal (62)
1256/94/10).
sirt-
April 23rd, 1925.
677
In his despatch Ho, 112 of February 80th last Bir R. Enslesy expressed his concurrenos in the view of Him Majesty's Dansul-General at Canten that money payments to help the loanl Chinese authorities to transport troeps to the room of notion are not an illegitimate extension of the policy of œseperation between His Majesty's Faroes wad the Chinese forses in the suppression of pårmay.
The policy of seperation having received the approval of Kis Kajesty's Gevazımant, the question whether
nay particular measure is or is not an unjustifiable extension of it must obviously be left to the discretion
At the shoe of the British authorities on the spot.
time, in view of the politionl dangers inherent in the policy of cooperation, it is essential that they should be extremely siroumapast in exercising their discretion. The general danger in that, by giving colour to the idea that Hongkong is being used as a base for interference in Chinaan affairs, anti-British propaganda may be increased natong Chithe so, and even in the minds of foreign govermanta suspicion may be aroused. There is also a particular danger, due to the impossibility of directly controlling the sets of ill-dissiplined soldiers and irresponsible officials, who may be mpacted ossasiemlly to exacute thair captures without taking the trouble to establuj their guilt in assordance with the principles of British justion. In these respects the conduct of joint operations in any case involves His Majesty's Government
The question is in a sertain risk of responsibility.
whether a system of maney payments (which insidentally,
18
Michael Palniret, Esq., 0,X.0.,
ete.. ata.. ata.