J
526
:
·
meort?rueba istoitte seedid Na Bolya TË
TO BOJSK 13 Jr Likte ezer stožży who ende Bruch saw -OTE D'ISY Resyalqın sinemad, wild dritë Dry,daki berguna DJ TINGENERt 31. Børes bemt ekï pakruiter mar? Da drwy +(21 purelor) nting adð að drepatria madhuit e de Liding o tamen odi n2 bermei rižu erit, rio bitw pet,ceroth demain -dramagoku yo qu meru, zev „dienyn bran ew grozni „itrouḍ Isqfofran diabetes meld to risetiado
mover of two pritvard, dramanLddwa DŘÍ to marină arid Bereti
■*mpo [trat odd,eremărit ndð ta ansiale adi od prkbrcoNE
•
*
pladırımutíab privæd to so znizioa einkrer de bedażlang a dial dengus no femmat ov,solio, #ið beinket
+
- AỐC XC ! með œin, (61,07 mumolens) dreaD INTE
DIE STÜ , decu marryl 1 fmoviðrei oft Indiskidag og dob ́s al • madmangga hart entigi edt daueft,indt znalo 31 pham bre
•
t
navrženab med den pintadres bad yola Deviboat need .0.5.2 vd of monabua,nakvimonty vid ruled dɑrt ww kgH
,getdate of dreammenul a'romanièrek nie załogter V Font Mund?715 #idstod Biton Beermokregra #vad kluarla
BLOKETA Se vam niit në Sedt édugh oljčki evast et „eldt
.BU TỐŤ ZDE rend hart diakibe gent
TATTO IN TU,Waist Tylose to tenażerkenal #ITI
cof-amil dal qui qď,eu dzma vidmoundedum Neka pods Ormiom ton mi dite te ferend in dały zu intgrado 31 dost I sugunilɗ th tent van To Anmacı oda ni „potig'i
•
t
4
meled for an aoithe 1,deft shellssmen ed il deɗt gatyw
and the letter was once again sent to us, this time by a messenger. We jointly made on the margin a note, signed by both of us, that we would not possibly ancept it, and we returned the letter. Then Hr, bo wrote to protest against thiɔ"double disburtesy",we replied that we œuld not rest under an imputation of bad faith, and that had he taken my advice originally, the subsequent unpleasant in- sident would not have occurred.
On August 15th my French Colleague and I addressed a formal protest to Mr. Moo Ping-shmung with refermos ta the Folios iroident, pointing out that, in spite of all assurances, the pickets were still maintained (enolo sure No.14). To this we received no reply.
On the same day we went to see Mr. Bugane Chen and asked him to arrange for us a private interview with Dr. dun, at which Mr. 0. 0. Mu should not be present, to enable us to explain matters and to request that the strike set- tlement be carried out si agreed, ir. Ühan undertook to do so, but later on suggested that it would be batter if we addressed a note puraɛlves to Dr. Am direct. This we did, sending the note through Ir. Uhen, whd. informed us the same svening that Dr. Sun would see us at 10 a.m. next day (August 16th).
At this intervier være present, besides purselves, Mr. Chen and Mr. Wei (the French-speaking Secretary to Dr. Jan, who had for was time past been in communication with my French blleague and had rendered us valuable assistanos). The interview lasted a considerable time, but in substance it merely apunted to our representing to Dr. San that the terus agreed upon had not been carried out on the Chinese side. Dr. Gun finally remarked that, Mr. Ibo Ping-shwing
having