ARI, OPUTUT KER

kuce?

sir,

Inclosure No. 8 in (r. §. Hilma's No.146 05 2/9/24

Tanton,

418

9th August; 1924.

"

„askipet „angri al ab

od doma að bezel woZINE TUGI

for

* debe had sent fette wenkeren dak ent «I

I

*:

-red matteVRSTA POTE

o aber nga at PATRO

And

IMVUDSISTLE nrque niti od teanga (or “I

TÜRMEK Olen bu di se rattih blokoyoq deye

But I

+

Ja veel ve net et moTİRDð „væri araç ke

nandito tną mi zato et tant ni han bibida es

trebaldre glisarerær komt ae moo® ===

PINA BO

Bluerim Bowldan sell to somatiquemton tartó, đáð add to mlv193

(or quoi LiFT 10%

Fale od Karla T Janiko ya að besɛətbi

+

In reply to your letter of August P9h, we have the honour to

point out that the proposed draft of Article 6 was suggested, not by úr, diles, but by Dr. Jur himself in the prezenas of yourself",

Kr. Bogene Then, die 0,0.hu and ourselves, Ye agreed to transmit the proposal to our respective buncils, although we felt doubtful if it wouli secure their approvaĀ, As to the original Artble 7.

while it was understood that it was not to form part of the pub-

lished teraRN, there was no suggestion that it was not to be reduo-

ed to writing.

This is the reason why it was embodied in the

novering letter to Dr. Sun.

At the Joint Meeting subsequently held between the two "bun-

oils and ourselves it was felt that the wring of 'r. Jun's

formule night, when the disciplinary massures dame to be enfbroed,

Henge an alterna- lay the Councils open to a charge of ball faith. tive proposal was evolved, which, while adhering to the lines laid down by Dr. Jun, would, it was thọught, meet this objention, Before formally submitting this alternative formula, we naturally felt it incumbent upon us to ascertain Dr. Shun's views, and the proposal was consequently conveyed privately to him through ir. Eugene Then in the latter's capacity of private de retary to Dr.

This elicited a rovised text communicated to us by Kr. Chen,

which substituted for the wording in Dr, Jun's original formula the phrase "agrement between the Chinese and Shameen Authorities",

This, ir. Chen infþræed us, had been approved by Dr. An, inan- much as it showed that, whatever measures vera talem would be the result of agrement between both parties, this being consistent with the principle of reaching a settlement which should leave no

Jun.

Too Fing-Jheung, Esquire,

-Cəmaissioner of Foreign Affairs,

Canton.

Share This Page