which was enced in the Reference
Thest No. 3/1923 dated the all Now,
1924,
J
reason
exception
Cap
wentigned in
Selo day.
advised that there is no
for admitting any special train to this procedure in the of Houghong,
cofecially
the Director of Col. Audit has had occasion in the fast to drow attention to the fact that the inclusion of expire. credits in the
accounts has had the effect of concealing considerable aunts, of unauthorised expre. in the account.
Colomjo
In this correction I would invite
your
орово
para. 5 of the
attention to fara.
refort of the Director of Col. Audit
بق
the Account for the year
ended
the Is Dec, 1922, or copy of which
was enced in the Duke
of
Devons lives
ded. No. 384 of the 18 Dec, 1923.
3.
with regard
to the question
(56001
marhandenes shich was
sed in
rating to the definition (11667) "["term "gross Seceipt" wind in panas. 2 and 3 letter of the 24th a hor? Him the Colmial Office Creasury.
of the recovery of Postal Transit Charges, which is dealt with in the fifth subsequent fares, of für RS Subho deep, I have to invite reference to
th
349
Lord Gere's desy. No. 116 of the
29 Afe, 1910, and to pection z of Order No. 1 of 1901, from
which it affears
to be
very
doubtful whether the treatment
of
ouch recoveries as
expire.
credits instead of including
them in the "gross receipts"
of the
Postal Deft. is in
accordance with the exis
autho
governing
existing
the calculation
of the Mil. Contribution, of
however,
revenne
Lartain items of
are to be exempted from
such assessment the correct
procedure to be followed is that which has already
bean