16
mid to b.a to suotsivong ent to autriv yd Jadr (E) 0'10 200..mik irto owd saadð „böĞİ „JOA V‡İLİLɛV ■wal Iainolo
at notdw „Egworë neve notterego lidi ni las bilav viðdalmq
ríðin tíðnkandout ses seoranžirn) esedi,bežnai yİnnetqza „EJNOIT Eď Vinetail ait no benoqui mooiðægildo end to yttusliyar múið að sham sử nạo nožtosjɗo os så
mottzeup at hand to alsozag edit summer of bedqpia embereʻzg
moitos down dołów robuus aeonani brü add li jonno akad ni
,0070) Lut to bus biísv oza neiled med evad of adrogurg
to LVI.a mbaw,528i,yist dies edd no sham xam sabro na
as noitasup suit tudi gaitoszib ‚owieoori Ikvið to sho© edi 107 kwob Jen eɗ álpode seomanibro essúd to willlLow milt að
Ils vantrsed down yni huq Jait bas „džiulėtot gnized
„bayata ed mani bewoong medizut
Inshaw Toű add žadið noitemu osia bluoda I nqadra¶
ail yɗ beawana anoidæglido que dadd seig reditut a bonist
a útiw ojai betežne nuidiaruco to yjaszt vas'ul võgo jai"
bas,wal Isqioiium. to nimmob sáð Lnoyed era statů ngis 10?
no nivel til død,two0 miɗð ni siɗasototoe Jon am
•
of basink Jon blb si Jait bien stiidukalt sát to †Laded
end of visviauiors Meamid Leuituos bas Jaloq aidi suyra Jon ximid to waiv nå neonsukit) out siit to y‡lbiler .seauelo yukino qaure gulmisəHOO
naw nilitakalч edð mi noliasdnoo wild „Jug Litroda
of a 300tquoi to omitalaiyed sit to ydizaldua adð Jarð
azettel est (TOKIS YOU) Bdë to mokanisanü add vor? becubel eď
ot owütet est dað lam gangi Joustani Layol odi ina insta¶
Layol wild to IIXX »ioidzå to stranslucet adi od amožnoo
potoli bus 3001 to 01.oll se onani irzů betahi isvai anoi Jouzdanī
ytibilaV swad Iskuolo) add to kia tarit bougra ell.Ofer 26
to eoneeds sið of sul: toetab adi ozum Jon hi5,0881,301
-Jourdant of seqneraler súð na domani sawało yalinoqaus a Istoege a to suoltovaženi od smw noitosɛ dalt vi anoi
ni Heviz 919 sa dous ancitoetik of Jon has mJULIANO
ofɔit
Article XXII of the Royal Instructions which are constitut- ional limitations on the action of the Governor as a branch of the Legislature,
In support of his argument and as showing the limitations on the power of action of the Governor Mr. Jenkin referred to Cameron v. Kyte 3 Knapp P.C. Cases p.352, Musgrave v. Pulido 5 A.C. p.102, and the Colonial Acts
Confirmation Act, 1894. In my opinion those cases refer to executive acts of Colonial Governors and merely lay down
the accepted principle that his powers in that respect are
limited to those which are conferred on him and that he has
not the full powers of sovereignity possessed by a Viceroy.
The preamble to the Colonial Acts Confirmation Act,
1894, appeared, at first sight, to lend considerable support
to the case for the Plaintiffs, but I think that the note
to that statute in Vol.2 of Chitty's Statutes (5th edition)
clearly explains the reasons for its enactment. The various
laws which were confirmed by it dealt with the reform of
the electoral law of the various Colonies mentioned in 8.2(2)
of the confirming Act, but serious doubt arose as to their
validity because two Acts of the Imperial Parliament
required in express terms that Colonial Acts of that nature
should be reserved for the Queen's approval. In the absence of such reservation it might well have been that the local
Acta were repugnant to the provisions of an Imperial Act extending to the various Colonies and therefore void for
repugnancy.
I have always understood the correct view as to the power of a Colonial legislature to be that it has full
power to legislate over all matters falling within the territorial limits of the Colony except in so far as any
such legislation is repugnant to an Order of His Majesty in Council, in the cases of Colonies in which power to legislate
by Order in Council has been retained, or to an Act of the
Imperial