15
,commi¿mű noiJqzwo!! almal nwort Bild to 6,a rohow sist of noidaliyeti weİTOJITÆT ml aid to M...a las 10001 to 0.ok Isouaq seant to noitqumex súd not MM to acto! .commžirgő to anotzivorg and Jadi taujast sgelie vadt Lutynơww ni ritiw noi‡uluqiða síð útim draðakanoond was anoidoes sanıld 152 to noijnevnoð elit ut bankaduno noitaisqorque of Joaquer
libidw ni seomanik10 edi (Vitrupendo,Jadi has,8281,must.
sắð to dnesna edð beviecez ovad son bluoda zangga yadó
ni causfo qui hose quam s beni atroo yulit ase Inu socm vol to snoijoustaal Layol sdf to IDX @lokëtå dikw ędkarsolnoo zaiboequus on Joal to midum a nå ‚888! „Temkin? AFRI
benoİJABB Yoda sit to reddie ik berkatnog nav sausio no vlajatbelest noitemyo odni ammo yoid bom nesamlİTÜ pratino echt ni xoris val) sáð yď od betonan: gakeď zledi S OF SA JABODxiuper eið Jadł Lundaco alliJnisi¶ our • ए.आ
wal yns to wibilav Bild of Laltimene zi ezuzio qui inequua alaltså ni útral des asinogajao sult to vas uldtker paillet
to comeda súd Jadi kas janaktorstaal Isyon add to In
janoijnem evoďa seQuantitů owt sift sejablismi sausio a dove
segalia thakimtol and constel to Jomentată zidi ya
-
"
•
noi Jaluzjah seksoðirist wil sđt to M...n yf daar (1)
ai meİTOJĚTEST wolf mild në hami IIa,QIVI to Dë,oll „sonantÜrgő
to tremorulion Dit wợt) as need evað oð bas „eð oð beraloeb
snið,00RI,wonant Errű (Jan) haal) mirođirnoT waN adi
add ton esa silktakel4 sát Jadź zawoʻzɔ out to y‡rsgorg
Birgir yas Jadð ina of bermter ovoda sisoisq sild to arBITWO
tehaus bovinah aww alaosaq blau scð ni baansmog za və yadd
əbanı İma „302I „doseli sBI adð boðað samei 20 ensimiti na
gnoT maY U kal año has Freq eco est la mwợnů silź menteď
jting mito add to yd mid noqu beratnco armoq edi mkuu gritos Jæft (S)
edit .0021 „comandit) notdquasi sõnal mwơn mié lo cie
Liss edit to notasessoq imaxinet nai Ikomeð al tomm VOË
bas ¡imal to alsoʻzeg
(c)
(3) That by virtue of the provisions of 8.4 of the
Colonial Laws Validity Act, 1864, these two Ordinances are
perfectly valid and in full operation even though, which is, expressly denied, these Ordinances are inconsistent with
obligations imposed on His Majesty by Treaty.
As no objection can be made to the regularity of the
precedure adopted to resume the parcels of land in question
in this case, if the Ordinances under which such action
purports to have been taken are valid and of full force,
an order was made on the 28th July, 1894, under s.174 of
the Code of Civil Procedure, directing that the question as
to the validity of these Ordinances should be set down for hearing forthwith, and that, pending such hearing, all
further proceedings be stayed.
Perhaps I should also mention that the Defendant raised a further plea that any obligations assumed by His Majesty in any treaty or convention entered into with a foreign state are beyond the domain of municipal law, and were not enforceable in this Court, but Mr. Jenkin on
behalf of the Plaintiffs said that he did not intend to argue this point and confined himself exclusively to the validity of the two Ordinances in view of their not containing suspending clauses.
Shortly put, the contention for the Plaintiffs was that the authority of the Legislature of Hongkong was to be deduced from the Commission of the Governor, the Letters Patent and the Royal Instructions; and that the failure to conform to the requirements of Article XIII of the Royal Instructions invalidated Ordinances No.10 of 1900 and No.34
of 1910. He argued that 8.4 of the Colonial Laws Validity Act, 1865, did not cure the defect due to the absence of
a suspending clause inasmuch as the references to instruct-
ions in that section were to instructions of a special
character and not to directions such as are given in
Article