case of
Mr D. S. Edward, Asst.
Engr., P.W.D., I understand
from
the
ea.
for
the
Col. that
1924
HONG KONG
C..
11296
10 MAR 24
59
prise to the inception of the
FROM
DATE
Ret
amangements
and in you.
• JAS Levern
42
8 February
conf.
desk. of the 14th
dept.
(52668)
FOR CIRCULATION:-
Beckert
Mr.
423,
all officers who synad
Mr
Appn. of
hur singh for grant of pension
Class I greements, as did the
Mr.
Aast. U.S. of S.
2nd class
Edward,
received
a
fassage by
Pro. mart
arteame
Porm U.S. of S.
or auch other
passage
The ca
Parl U.S. of S.
Secretary of Starte.
states that in any
bur awarded
Jurnished
parties of the case.
event
10 Rack Sirigh
Andr
pension ed. have dismissal.
considèred suitable.
that les Edward's passage
before the
mito force,
nati
was
booked before
the mens
annagemento
carme
but that
вид
ther wonder
a
ce. I agreement
he bdwore have
all officeirs spported
suice the appl. f
necewca
In ce passages.
3 one ca vice contenere to
provide in le passages for
I agreements.
mmen
engaged on
Signed) J. H. THOMAS
Mar 21+
رک
And. 81-
Previous Paper
H
56556723
Subsequent Paper
MINUTES
Idicin
The broke the rule which forbids Policemen to bring their wives families to
Hong
without permission. The
مه وه
given
two chances to sand his wife back to India, & failed.
Cho Ke Prove a
not defored
but
good character, he was
being dismosed the Force,
was allowed to remain in All
where he has found other employment. The
is therefore wit destitute.
The had not served the 10 yea
for fansion,
One
M
ему
vec,
care would not get
owing to dismissal
? and too to inf him that
1281: 18624,27 80,000 11/28-MoC-E 258