admissible
Act 19. They
ast howwen for feara
0
extrusion
The
3 дествить
naval
day
doch (which
DISABLED
G
they think adinissith!)
(ii) storage of spare parts foraicraft
(ii) Estäblichement of R.NO.R. (apparently
their crews on this had changed
somewhat since 1760)
14 Dec.
C...D. decided
on above
(1) refer to 70 regal itdiners
(iil no objection
(i) no
objection
decision officially communicated A CO.
in Willis of 30 Dec (172)
12 Jan 70.6 c.10. (1850)
agamist (1). In arguing
7.0. advise against (1).
the case Key say
cr
It was, in the I. of S'o new,
aburags cealised
in the case
at Washington that
of fonts like Hong Kong
which is at the same
and
Ала
time a naval statio
important commercial port, A
was inpossibh to forbid the increase of the commmercial facilities of the port, such as docks, on the ground that the incuand facilities would be available for warshifo
فراد
It is therefore only "navel facilities
dealt with inArt 19"
which are
C.O
Any further communication should be addressed to-
The Secretary of the Admiralty,
2997
RE
London, S.W. 1.
IRE
16
quoting
1.43758/22.
Sir,
8
L.P.--No. 8.
23 JA:
Admiralty, S. W. 1,
16th January,
.192 B
I am commanded by My Lords Commissioners of
the Admiralty to acknowledge receipt of your letter Ca 59046/1922 of the 14th December, forwarding a copy of
a report by Messrs Goode, Fitzmaurice, Wilson and
Mitchell on the subject of harbour development of Hong
Kong, which has been read with interest,
I am to return herewith the copy of the
2.-
Report.
3.-
Adewey
54425/2
I am in this connection to draw attention
to Admiralty Letter M.0255 of 28th October pointing
out that in consequence of the Washington Treaty
His Majesty's Government will not be in a position to
subsidise any works designed for the Harbour development
of Hong Kong.
I am, Sir,
The Under Secretary of State,
Colonial Office.
Your obedient servant,
Marrak