Lie In Rusty her Collins.
The antifrich in
For A Lar
wow been
by the tips and
ん
sygnies
be returned to for for fun.
action
بست
in pare o of cine
:
of 28. April 1815 and
sho point out to for
AL
LULE
in tomallimate fare of your
aumati
4-
A
the chither
Ato eyard the wife qvention is it exfficeins o say that foot in advied that the Crown Don's Fine
correct
maller.com
مه
ค
that the
set out further
ட்
Minat?
Jour
E
shot note this paper, other
with the point.
dise, i
Commation
1scher
13/2/24
XA
I think this work on anough the
ath
plification was
"
really intended in fation"
home commun
ASA
My dear kalkin,
DOWNING STREET,
10 February, 1927.
481
any thanks for your letter of the 7th. I have attached it to the liong Kong paper in order that the point should be further considered if and when we get another similar cuse.
At present I am still inclined to think that the Act of 1914, being for the purposes of Imperial maturalisation the lex fori of the whole Empire, the terms "wife" "chila etc., must be construed according to the general law of the
and not according Hapire which prescribes monogamy
to any particular religious or personal law which may be recognised for limited purposes such as
I should like to see the succession to property.
the Act of 1914 construed strictly. The Secretary
hur But
A
annex some correop with the talkin
subject of the offobune, of poly An
mañes. This paper me
that it
by hour, ht up if
"The 'em like bees JJA
but be noted, to
1612/27
M.E. Ret
fen Refst see
and CBB
sun jod 15/2/2
M 10/2/27 alon Noted in Precedent Bol C Regist
of State can grant a special certificate to "any mino under Section 5 (2) and that would meet a possible
case of real hardship.
.Malkin, Esq., C.B., C.M.G.,
WJB
JR.