|

MINUTES.

MINUTES NOT TO BE WRITTEN ON THIS SIDE.

480

English Court as legitimate for

the purposes of succession to

property to which Chinese law was

applicable, the British

Nationality etc. Act 1914 is a

British and not a Chinese law

and must I think be taken to

contemplate only one wife to the

exclusion of all others and

only children born to a man by

that wife.

It is true that there

18 no general British code of

marriage extending to all His Majesty's Dominions in the same

way as the Act of 1914 extends

as a general code of British nationality, but, subject to the existence of polygamy amongst

certain races in different parts

of His Majesty's Dominions and its legal recognition for certain purposes "marriage" in English law and also in that of the

Dominions and Colonies primarily

implies monogamy, and where a

Statute such as the Act of 1914

refers to "wife" "married woman"

"marriage", "child" without any

definition extending the ordinary

meaning of these terms I think

it must be taken to apply (in

the language of the text books) to "marriage as understood in

Christendom

4

The love of this cour

courting

to the tuation mana

is adapts

is wholly inapplicable to hol [Hzyka w Heyde LRIPOD

KA

C

X as of course it should have

bun! Su parn 4 of

"Instructims (A)" fact out on

the Ciscutor of 25 Apul

415 WA.

Christendom" .

There is one point which

may be of importance not mention- ed in the Memorial or elsewhere

in the papers, viz. the birthplace

of these two children.

Prima facie as their

inclusion in the certificate is

asked for one would suppose that they were not born in the Colony, but as it is stated that Lee has

not left the Colony for 10 years and that the two boys (born in 1915 and 1922 respectively) are together with their respective mothers living with him in Kowloon it seems not improbable that they were born in the Colony,

and if so they are of course natural-born British subjects and the question of including them in the certificate does not arise.

This should be pointed out when

this despatch is answered.

First? certificate in

Form A to Secretary of State to

sign but not date.

مشابه

JAR. 8/2/24

once

6/2/24

Мавески

Share This Page