expressed si
1
the colomae
• a's france
affrenate
285
exerventry,
Atgodd
any obroms,
DRAFT.
that
you
may
Andee.
me s. gs. reprstemning
stre Act,
is advised that
judgment
the Hongkong
Ander
Comment i
doing something different from
arressing damages (as in ti Fernando v temon Amits & Lo
(1920) 3 K. B. 400
judgment mi
geving
an action to enforce
a farey's judgment (as in beatt v Beanan, 23. Ad.78), that is
may f the
Ima
• o
considered
that rather
percipites laid down in the two cases cited can be applied to
the registration of lysstation.
MINUTE.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
A
Sir C. Davis.
Sir G. Grindle.
to
the currency
be converted,
Sir H. Read.
is motimed
to frame the
mitorderced
to from the date at wh.
to offer generally
ته
the matter.
}
am to requem
that the enclosed
Araps unles
may
be
returned
worthy
4
His france adaption of the date of repratiation wh. The bo. J. I kx. has adopted in
mule
3.
مة
The 1. f
the central office of what penetice is foclowed
A sought to regrates ina of Fasslation for boopor
Par II of the Administration of Justic
1
1820,
a
to learn
Axframe Comf
colonial judgment
Sir J. Masterton Smith.
Mr. Ormsby-Gore.
Duke of Devonshire.
your reply.
(Signed) G. BRINDLE