in pension that this point might

have been faced.

Any how we have got to take the

minute as it stands. On what I

Don't see hour Sir R. Stubbs proposal

- to allow an extra year as Judge – can

stand, and I Don't Link

O

J

My Hunter's

'method is in the

jour connais

7

-minute, and I certainly don't like my suggested importation of Rule 17 (2).

Viewing the whole thing & bearing in

mind the private letter, it seems clear

itai

some additional pension to the

5/1/60 of £1500 plus 1/30 of £2400

ought to be granted. If so,

granted

it will have

to be voted, and then M. Henler's method

of calculation ought to be used as the fairest all round.

veing

? Suggest this to for. Dash Cypers

to compute its bit of pension.

(N.B. the limit in 3 8 is now raised A ₤1300)

of

2.10.23.

Jaysen

5/10

At once ASC 5

This is I thinth

a

very

good colution

of the difficulty

Mr Blood on thebandt

M. Richards, with whom Thame

discussed this question, has

that the came

жузе and be met by simply

amending Clause 197(3) othe

128

Pension

Merinte by extending it to all Judges

transferred to H. Rong, errespective of length

As it stands, the judge

of service.

hans.

ferred to H. Kory & then retricig after less than 7 years scores in the Colony w geb better terms then the judge with more then

7 years server.

fou

ac

disposed to agree

that

to Nechards' suggestion is better than mine,

and it has,

Simplicit

Коли

addition, the merit of

Besides, it avoids as

tempering. with Claus 2, which deals priment

with an

office whore whole sewer has been in H. Rory.

Chacorded draft onbruitted.

H. oct. 17.9823.

yes: there is one case

would pay

Au

where it

Jadge to come unsu aule 2 instead of 17 & that is where he has served exactly 7 years. Kule

2 would give him 15/60 for that I the later rule only 14/60. But that Downe # 17-16

Ask

matterų much.

Share This Page