for each
умал
together with
one six with
the o
J
salary
received
by him previous to his becoming a
calculated on 4
4 years
12/ 89 months
service with an addition
ช
36 months
-93 months all told. This comes
C
= ₤193·15·0
Judge for
koch
year of
his sawire
in such other capacity
#
•
The
clause allowing the addition of ound
a praction of 5 years
as the pre-judge
sewice bears to the total
con
hardly
be made to imply the allowing of pactions of a year. In the case before
us the addition operates to bring the
pre-judge service up to 5 years. In
any event
a
even
if
we did allow
fraction there, I don't see how it
could be allowed in the case of
suvice
Ad
$2 (1)
te
Judge, under the better of
There is another possibility which
has occured to ma
-
Hough & Don't
nimire it much. Could his sevire
as A. 9. in vrow
is a
the fact that he
transferred officem, be separated
from his service as Judge, and dealt with under $17 (2)? He would then
have,
in
virtue
of
his 9 years service
an addition
before he went to thong-Kong,
not exceeding 1/3 of such service- og 36 months.
I would be eligible for a pensio
93/120 of £1500 F
VL
£68.15
MUZUR
then the ₤ 125 La
can get under the complete year
rule 9
32.
Sa R. Stubbs wants
to give him an extra £ 80 so this
would be less.
But I don't like this, as I have said above, because it ignores the
words "other than a Judge" in the
317(2). It may
15
first line
however be the case that, like 31703)
this only refers to people transfered
as Judges.- but I doubt whether this
is the was arguable
or not.
The minute does not really
deat
16 to
with a case like this one.
they faced hardly conceivable that the possibility
of a man with continuous sevire
in the same
Colony losing a year
а
for pencion because he didn't put in complete years in each job he held.
on the other hand Judges do so well
--
i
F