Eet
4
• Ev
494
@auoH JnemETTE VOL)
.anofsack
„oser, ringa DIE
mistreo to seigon socľams at woned sáž svad I
[arengƐ» [umaçð s1yłnoþalí a brustad 178 828 dát ku sonekuoquerTIDO grofynel ja tasagiiimmest sát že žvejdam odł no lad
ail to mám odit
most bezroqab meerweg to -usethha ma I „amidð vel dspoð samagaƐ a1ytongalí o hanað Þe bluew #253 andé hataturahmu I enumeď Joejdem add no pot 201 voastral Jerfi sát xi Jenba et ezzyon Joerse sdt meď a taď arusoed Istene¤-İzmae) odt bossesbba I tudt nisique kinow I hevisoen yddand to Jos¿dan od no noktaolmummon Jwx22 add Joetɗve sát ne exaď bevissen mediai vino adi kua mia mort .mid port osla sam
do hár obam eď you smoldavrando Leraneg sladzeð
.noimanoal to bâlî ad? MOTLMT [ÍÍN erit Jadð baðan að yar ti,amalq jezit odit ni bzamovi vil to dipazjezaq hæreses ant að að berzelor amidel -tubrogab edi ei selez praradet dibi adi te vajte! a'maaTĪ „gnotanol al reonetna sjedi arzon of time sacstag To sol gfzsefe flastuóð-Hi-Torta vol adź neowing dove to samo adi al (a)(1)8 noiJoss rebau mbre coltatvagnà a sonel of so00g Bad {ent to à moltoes yd bas „TICI,sentaalbs) možtatroquï edt to katroqab acid Tobro of rawag nad zomin vol edź sonar1b10 ema ,75 79082adı qida yra yď profeð sář not? drugsh of conting mo zamankıq edt to meltmateb add to? și brodina lagal edi Jeum ynolod ad to min on thf ad chở cát một bund
JB0%
„ISE INTEL. 0!!|
TUOGOH • iH
rest upon the warrant of the Judge of the Supreme Court for China. The case of persons who have not served their sentence in the Colony is not on the same footing as that of persons who have served their sentence here, because
there is in general no power to deport British subjects.
The two persons mentioned in the third paragraph of Sir Everard Fraser's letter seem to have left
the Colony voluntarily. There may, however, have been cases during the war in which deportess from China were
compulsorily deported from Hongkong. This was quite
simple while the powere conferred by His Majesty's Order
in Council of the 26th October, 1896, could be exercised.
That Order in Council, however, was intended primarily for
war purposes, and though it has not yet been formally repealed as to Hongkong it is doubtful whether it could
properly be invoked now for ordinary purposes. The actual power of choosing a particular ship for persons ordered to quit the Colony under the above Imperial Order in Council was given by section 13 of the Travellers' Restriction
Ordinance, 1915.
5. Having referred in my letter of the 19th Jamary to the doubt as to whether the warrant of the Judge of His Britannio Majesty's Supreme Court for China would cover the detention on board the transhipping ship on its voyage from Hongkong to the place of destination
I may say that I am of course fully prepared to accept your view that the warrant has this effect. My only legal difficulty now is as to whether I have any power to compal the master of any given ship to accept a deportes as a prisoner. Sir Harard Fraser agreed that article 124 of the China Order in Council, 1904, applies only to a master who is within the jurisdiction of His Britannic Majesty's
.psd,nisnů tedes
'yinsjaki o immat kď #iH to egbut
,sand rol ¿woÛ sadiquë
(30-7878) Wt. 20112/3 Gp. 140 80,000 11 22 WAN LAG.
Supreme