P

1f

+

EPC

471

Car c

4

For 50384

20

case of appointments of non-Chinese members of the Legislat- ive Council.

ii. The adoption of a larger electoral body than at

present exists.

iii. An unofficial majority.

As regards these proposals, I remain in

principle of the same opinion as when I wrote my despatch

of 29th July, 1920, though for reasons which I will give later I should at the present time view the introduction of

an electoral system with considerable misgiving.

6.

Subject therefore to what I have to say later,

I support the two first requests, I am in favour of the election of six Europeans, one to be elected by the Chamber of Commerce and five by a general body of electors, the number of Chinese members being at the same time increased to three.

I do not entirely agree with the proposal e contained in the petition with regard to the nature of the electorate, as I adhere to the views expressed in paragraphs 7 and 8 of my previous despatch. Government servants should not have votes, as they constitute so large a proportion of the European community that the temptation to use their votes for the purpose of securing personal advantages would be too great to be resisted, and a reasonable period of residence I suggest two years should be required. The vast majority of the population is Chinese and it would not be fair to them that persons who have so large a control over their destinies should be elected by the votes of new- comers who know nothing of the conditions under which they

live.

·

7.

The point on which I am entirely opposed to

the petition is that of an unofficial majority. I have set

out my views fully in paragraph 5 of my previous despatch

and increased experience only strengthens them. The case

of

Share This Page