Cop
Enc] oeure
2.
REPORT
ON
387
ATTORNEY
GENERAL'S
CHALBERS,
Hongkong, 19th February, 1923.
ORDINANCE NO. 2 of 1923.
1.
I have examined the accompanying Ordinance intituled An Ordinance to amend further the Medical Registration Ordinance,
1884, and I am of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is
not contrary to the Governor's Instructions.
2.
Sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Medical Registration Ordinance, 1864, as enacted by section 3 of the Medical Regis- tration Amendment Ordinance, 1914, was a temporary provision
inserted to safeguard certain possible rights. It has never
been used. Section 2 of the present Ordinance therefore
repeals it.
3.
•
Section 11 of the Medical Registration Ordinance, 1864,
should have been repealed by the Kedical Registration Amendm. **
ment Ordinance, 1914, as the whole question of the right to
registration is dealt with in the section added to the prin-
cipal Ordinance by section 5 of the amending Ordinance.
Section 3 of the present ordinance repeals this unnecessary
section.
4. Under the Ordinance of 1884, persons could be registered
wherever their qualifications were acquired, and the right
to registration did not depend in any way on the standard set