eet
200
t
KITRO THE OCIATURHOD
to jqisost add subelvonios of tronod add @vad I Is/Vazoj „trætend,bers and no betab, SA\VOJ,ok rejtel woy
■bum Jużzī ́NCO ♦ni pakwanoo ajnabbed owok to netgoo ddiw No Lak zadƐ yach „mal net yao,#infok yď
Jemi 3759
Oda
bare vooey do noijnetni mrkt cht kw com Byonos,alio of besoetg að mbro ni bìaq yodd dadd
trob remst said to qoro no Izow and to id ai Jouzjnos a to amend beri” ́& FAT själveno) sirit to
by ni siada woY
CMTİTA
Janob na radjai
•
V The Snei ad cù benTROTÇ
Feroberqueð doUR 6/°ù FL. MOT↑ J^super of oval voy,mrutvedt voort bra yðitadjus oð (00,406,00)} mal(ob berbual and Camodt sno to grinder to con blur and load golpes to sacqruit and rol,sol110 moy .:*Viðnialq edð od venom
Ien? I das pesuun! quve of ylost ni „yan où 234 I
Jon 795 . autoza 1'iw poy chuid pidators I did na yıros drom no foss“ „Jpauper toy dair gałyiqnoo
alooma Bido to y‡ij idienuqtar and anuAD BŪ
I*
na batok ni suarai to? 8Jxfunnoð add yd bezada lly end Bigence onw yneqzol) niquid ees juniīna oberimba „zk mugė od szani and Sna ayli? ab old? Yan markaq ma ***ij
-:njalara of - I na peli
side Jal li:0 70% aragodamaq. Yano illin “voda oni
Tads! BEI and no bol kwa do jen
.
bolf on spe
ou roldalra o moitærgins orð dæmt nybelwort: [[d] Tebow,ISEI
...Ù.M.5,119 veƐ bus() .nоE
4
‚ÇımiezoeƐ fainofo0
⚫ynognof
G
H.
Chile was forbidden, because the newspapers of Hongkong had al- ready published an official notice to that effect, which fact was also known by the Steamship Company "Toyo Kisen Kaisha," according to the attached copy of document No.1.
The Consulate for Chile, which office was open during
the whole month of December 1921, had no interference or inter- vention in the trip of the comphining Chinese passengera, and did not stamp its "visa", in their passports taking into consi- deration the prohibition of Immigration issued by the Chilean Government:- (Document No.2.)
I wish to impress the fact that, having that prohibi- tion been made widely known, actually existing in Hongkong a Chilean Consular Office and a Chilean Consul in functions, the Consul for Panama, Hr. Edmundo Molino, not only stamped his "visa" to the passports of the plaintiffs, thus stepping on the privilege of the Consulate for Chile and acting against the Chilean Govern- ment instructions, but also visaed fifty five (55) passports of Chinese bound to Chile in transit through Panama, Chinese who were making a trip, as they made it, in Japanese steamers starting from Hongkong and ending their voyage at the Chilean port of Valparaiso,
This unfair conduct of the Panamanian Consul, Mr. Ed- mundo Molino, was the subject of two protests formulated by me to the Consulate for Panama in Hongkong, and of a communication to my own Government on the matter.
Furthermore, the passengers who had been travelling under such irregular conditions and in contravention of the Supre- me Chilean and Panamanian Authorities were expelled both from Panama and Chile under the right of sovereignty.
Now I must put forward the fact that the responsibility of the "yo Kisen Kaisha," is an undeniable one, and I base this
opinion of the Company failing to make good the cost of the return
pessages to Hongkong that they had to pay under the order of ex-
pulsion of said travellers.
The post of Compradore of the Chilean Consulate for-
mer