veems to be still inn
Chena. So on to
Jay that alltingle the
Finally 406
There appears
tobe no
case for asking I kany
J し
practice
under the Col.
to pay any
hart-
Presences Removal
of
Art is no.
directl
relevant it may
все
Eelevant by way of Analogy Lender the
Art....
as in fit. Reilags
Euclare
all exferns.
- copy of
the circular of 16 Afrib 59
wh shows the practice
Coronal
as to tritesteffubqnti convicted by sritiste
Courts
exercising jure dictér
Out of H. h. Dominering under the Foreign Jurisdictin
Aut
Than
a
in tit
་
Reiley's memento" According
0760
or to India?
Then as in 52 of hei
dora, a
Justo L N Kong or hidin
the lypeures of
removal K
vapperting
than 1.0.oh would told
oh with trean & 10.
The question wheller 4. M. G.
should
or India
/Lay
Ashe St. Kony fon
infor
above
11.10.3 4.5
Aldu