4
possible to set one service off against the other,
I suppose that it may be necessary even though it
is somewhat undesirable-to pay something to the
existing men to get them to do the work, but I do
not see why future appointees should not be
called upon to proceed to Shanghai or Hongkong as
the case may be to help constitute an Appeal Court
as part of their normal duties.
The usual Treasury argument in these cases
-
takes the form of this dilemma either the man has
plenty of leisure in which case it is quite fair to
ask him to do the extra work without extra payı ol
else if he has no leisure the arrangement is an
unsound one and should not be permitted.
Yours sincerely
Dr Bridges
DRAFT.
E.E. Bridges Fez M.C
Mr.
MT.
Zeny
MINUTE.
HP 29
Beach 29
Mr. Collins 20
Mr. Davis.
Sir G. Grindle.
Sir H. Read.
Sir J. Masterton Smith.
Mr. Ormsby Gore.
Duke of Devonshire.
2 efri cons.
20. 46528/149.
Store2c
Dear L. Bridges
Here
G
Com
the 20
lec.
398
2 Jan 1922 1
you
سے جا کر کی
of the perprant that
has passed
Parlice of thongthong
thougtong shot
asti.
the subject
Fun Chirf
from time to time &
спесивые п
for China.
arrangement
of the C. f.
ď
to Shanghai
Count By Affect.
The 70. proposed that
to the commmeration cen
should be
the fac
at present
fres
ulation to the budge
of them
Aard
Key
A
Count of Affeal at Houghing;
asted
C
存
afte
a A
to their consulting the Eressing
financial arrangement without waiting:
for Hougtong's Aservations. We agreed, and