១៩៩
12
Bus) alako ezzuld? *
+:
T
~
pilasthian uztarol yalŝoutta ni mtory nuc qunm bond we woke
(4)
331
on Vay 22nd the Wai Chiao Pu addressed a formal despatch to the
Dean of the Diplomatic Body drawing the attention of the Foreign
Representatives to the provisions of the Chinese Fationality
Law, and requesting that their respective Consule might be noti-
fied not to admit any Chinese citizen into their nationality un-
less he could produce papers of denationalisation from the Min-
istry of the Interior,
In circulating this communication to
hi Colleagues (see enclosure No. 4) the Dean,
who chances to be.
the Portuguese Minister and therefore the ren-esentative of one
70230-funne) wit
10 Fadd med skinny lodgrad“ J
15037 20 cm yrittimos miere of Interes
et shrawn 20*
ว
A
ri
* Luano : * an end to "Y? va bean) to 45 denza:
milostng to fewerbɗźbe við veibmago ·
Panedybde I (ɣdifænoitan eIdoch.
-no-ingangs to ar-220sup #..? zadź mont
1
„bəs by jamu IIIže na agiste ugeigenas ki
!C DAISTUITO TO
g math noIJEČÍR AL
Hils hadɔonaco #leba ɔr
J11
JGS
JISAJUTą trilereɔ aglomek tembe
: **wo¡La 90 binɑw zadina, and ma
of the offending Tatin Powers, proposed that the question should
be studied by a Committee of the Diplomatis Rody.
It in to be feared that this vexed question is hardly
one which lends itself to treatment by at. International Commins-
ion; while the fact that the Chinese Government have thus bem
led to bring the matter themselves before the Diplomatic Body
will scarcely tend to facilitate any negotiations we may initi
with them separately on a somewhat different aspect of the C
question.
In conclusion, referring to Your Lordship's telegrai
No. 18 of January 14th, I need searcely point out that this
question would be settled, as far as this Legation 1a concerned,
by a ruling that paragraph 25 of Chapter XXV of
• new