1
12-2.
552
Ied
1:
her tolkua evad zout
+
* to feratd thon 201
- י
-
stow Todto "hovo beint til *:
you will find yourselves concerned with this point. With Be
romarka Gentlemen, I will leave the matter in your hands in that
you may retire and occaider your vordios. In doing so ant to
-hand own to you a set of questions and it has been suggested to
yon the t your vordiet might take the fom of ansvors to the ne
questions. The questi ors are
1
PELE JE ZA ZE
And trombo e ai thebut
Ja Ja BOY [ na uro
ONG] BELT OM BYLA Pra orquz 20 DLS
کو
חזור
HÉR A PA nadý
* dress for foRLO MONThe ado
2.
That is the madionl onuss of the death of Tam Shui Piu ?
To you find that the crovd widle r, King spoke to it at the
7 mile point on the Tai Po Road was on "Unlawful asembly"?
3.
If eo, did it devbe davelop into a "riot" before the a amani
to fire was given ?
4
Jas the cormand to fire reasonable and necessary?
**
S.
Wan the firing done excessive ?
movis VicMoRKET R
en de to vēlĺov om
1
tigt net rout of movi; rend holi
DGOVOR
g deed en wol Boz
and tolerang daw yellow al
poke to me ored Barolo Ama bunny
Ilang må Tuterenown grind wit
ordea adorḥ onedt #
:
*ver Toldo oft setstones ai:
*
720% n cs es oh I bam
-
trie este duz eső
Vit með inna að ættaðr tini
1
nb teken mi fost a ne fait dem Dom
buk utan, and to 12 WOMAN
tongue for eb I dat ghlovež odors T
NT
Is the death a case of "lamlaughter" or of "Justifiable
Homicide."
Then you may add any remarks yon may wish to add.
Your duty
is to m Swer au your vordiet the first and sissy sixth quartion.
1
The answers to the other four questions yould really set ont
the reasoning by which you arrive at your vordiet. If you like
to set out your rons are openly in terms it would bo ofvl
but it is entirely optional to you.
The Jury rotired to consider their verdict and were absont from a Cart
for newly two hours. Upon their return 'tr. Leask, the Foreman
of the Jury read the verdict as follows:-
We find that Tam Phia Piu died of the effects of a ballet fired
the instance of Deputy Superintendent Zing on the morner of the
3rd March, 1922, and after the most careful eoncid ion of a the evidence that has been placod before us,
is one of justifiable hozielās.
our unaninous verdict
We desire to have the fdlowing remarks placзd a rocord:-
1.
To consider that the crowd left the Po Hing Theatre with the intention of leaving the Colony, knowing that it was contrary to the law to do so, am that the disaster in question was brought entirely upon themselves by their obduracy in disregarding the ropestod warnings comoyad to them in their own language by Deputy Superintendant in, and the inspectors ans sergents